Formale Pragmatik

Veranstaltungsnummer: 4282 [eKVV]
Veranstaltungsart: Proseminar/Hauptseminar
Zeit: Donnerstag, 10-12h
Raum: Brechtbau, Raum 035

Gerhard Jäger
Büro: SfS, Raum 1.20
Sekretariat: 1.22 (Christine Clauder)

Kursbeschreibung

In dem Kurs werden aktuelle Forschungsartikel zur formalen Pragmatik gemeinsam erarbeitet. Im Wesentlichen werden wir uns dabei auf das Problem der Implikaturen in ihrem Verhältnis zur kompositionalen Semantik konzentrieren.

Dabei sollen zwei Ansätze zur formalen Pragmatik kontrastiert werden:

Semesterplan

Datum Thema Literatur Referent 
23.04.2009 Einführung    
30.04.2008 Überblick: die Griceschen Maximen

Gerhard Jäger 
14.05.2009 Grice (Forts.)
Larry Horns Verteidigung des neo-Griceschen Programms
Horn (2005)
Gerhard Jäger
28.05.2009 Skalare Implikaturen als Teil der Grammatik
Chierchia et al. (to appear)
Kilian Evang
18.06.2009 Experimente zu skalaren Implikaturen
Papafragoua & Musolino (2003) Elisabeth Tivonenko
25.06.2009 Neurolinguistische Untersuchungen zu Implikaturen
Noveck, I. and A. Posada (2003)
Anna Pryslopska
02.07.2009 Skalare Implikaturen in komplexen Sätzen
Sauerland (2004)
Aleks Dimitrov
09.07.2009 Skalare Implikaturen, Exhaustivität und Gricesches Schließen
Spector (2007)  Chris Miller 
16.07.2009 Conversational implicatures: nonce or generalized?
Reboul (2004) Natalia Strap
23.07.2009 Spieltheoretische Pragmatik
Franke (2008)
Gerhard Jäger

Literatur:

Grundlagen:

Bach, Kent (2006): The Top 10 Misconceptions about Implicature.

Bach, Kent (1994): ‘Conversational impliciture’, Mind & Language 9, 124–162.

Grice, H. P. (1989): Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Franke, Michael (2008): What is Game Theoretic Pragmatics, Manuscript, Amsterdam


eingebettete Implikaturen:

Chierchia, G. (2004): Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface, in A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond, Oxford University Press.

Chierchia, Fox, and Spector "The Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures and the Relationship between Semantics and Pragmatics", to appear in Handbook of Semantics, Paul Portner, Claudia Maienborn et Klaus von Heusinger (Eds), Mouton de Gruyter.
http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/WMzY2ZmY/CFS_EmbeddedSIs.pdf

Fox, Danny (2006): Free Choice and the Theory of Scalar Implicatures, Ms., MIT.
http://web.mit.edu/linguistics/people/faculty/fox/free_choice.pdf

Horn,  Laurence R. (2005): The Border Wars: a neo-Gricean perspective. In K. Turner & K. von Heusinger (eds.), Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics. Elsevier.

Recanati, F. (2003): Embedded implicatures, Philosophical Perspectives
17(1), 299–332.

Russell, Benjamin (2006): Against Grammatical Computation of Scalar Implicatures. Journal of Semantics, 23(4):361-382

Sauerland, Uli (2004): Scalar implicatures in complex sentences, Linguistics and Philosophy 27, 367–391.

Sauerland, Uli (2004): On embedded implicatures. Journal of Cognitive Science 5:107–137.
http://www.zas.gwz-berlin.de/mitarb/homepage/sauerland/journals/JCSimplicatures.pdf

Spector, Benjamin (2007): Scalar Implicatures: Exhaustivity and Gricean Reasoning. In: M. Aloni, A. Butler & P. Dekker, Questions in Dynamic Semantics, Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, Elsevier.
http://lumiere.ens.fr/~bspector/Crispi_Spector_Final.pdf

van Rooij, Robert & Katrin Schulz, Exhaustive interpretation of complex sentences, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13: 491–519.


Experimentelles:

Bezuidenhout, A. L. and R. K. Morris (2004). Implicature, relevance and default pragmatic inference. In I. A. Noveck and D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental Pragmatics, Chapter 12, pp. 257–282. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.

Breheny, Richard, Napoleon Katsos & John Williams (2006): Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An online investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition 100, 434-463.
http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/richardb/defaultness%20of%20implicatures.pdf

Noveck, I. and A. Posada (2003). Characterizing the time course of an implicature: an evoked potentials study. Brain and Language 85, 203–210.

Papafragoua, Anna & Julien Musolino (2003): Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognition 86:253-282.
http://papafragou.psych.udel.edu/papers/cog_scales.pdf

Reboul, A. (2004). Conversational implicatures: nonce or generalized? In I. A. Noveck and D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental Pragmatics, Chapter 15, pp. 322–333. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
Storto, Gianluca & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2004): Are Scalar Implicatures Computed Online? in: Proceedings of WECOL 2004.