ESSLLI 2005

Linguistic Treebanks and Data-Intensive Parsing


Course Schedule

 

Monday

 Treebank annotation slides

 Dependency versus constituency based annotation slides

  • D. Lin (1995). A Dependency-Based Method for Evaluating Broad-Coverage Parsers. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-95. Montreal, Canada.

Tuesday  Error correction slides

  • M.Dickinson & D. Meurers (2003). Detecting Inconsistencies in Treebanks. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT 2003). Växjö, Sweden.
     

  • M. Dickinson & D. Meurers (2003). Detecting Errors in Part-of-Speech Annotation. Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-03). Budapest, Hungary.

 PCFGs and annotation schemes: a comparison slides

  • C. Manning & H. Schütze (1999). Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, ch. 11.
     

  • S. Kübler (2005 submitted). How Do Treebank Annotation Schemes Influence Parsing Results? Or How Not to Compare Apples And Oranges.

Wednesday

 Treebank transformations slides

  • M. Johnson (1998). PCFG Models of Linguistic Tree Representations. Computational Linguistics 24:4.
     
  • T. Ule (2003). Directed Treebank Refinement for PCFG Parsing. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT 2003), Växjö, Sweden.
     
  • T. Ule & J. Veenstra (2004). Iterative Treebank Refinement. Proceedings of the 14th Meeting of Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands (CLIN 2003). Antwerp, Belgium.

 Dependency parsing slides

  • H. Yamada & Y. Matsumoto (2003). Statistical Dependency Analysis  With Support Vector Machines. Proceedings of IWPT2003, 8th International Workshop of Parsing Technologies. Nancy, France.
     

  • J. Nivre & J. Hall & J. Nilsson (2004). Memory-Based Dependency Parsing. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL). Boston, MA.

Thursday  History-based parsing slides1 slides2

  • M. Collins (1997). Three Generative, Lexicalised Models for Statistical Parsing. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the ACL (jointly with the 8th Conference of the EACL). Madrid, Spain.
     
  • M. Collins (1999). Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
     
  • D. Klein & C. Manning (2003). Accurate Unlexicalized Parsing. Proceedings of ACL-2003. Sapporo, Japan.
     
  • E. Charniak (2001). Immediate Head Parsing for Language Models. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the ACL and  the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL, ACL/EACL 2001. Toulouse, France.
Friday

 Hybrid parsing models slides1 slides2

  • J. Trushkina and E. Hinrichs (2004). A Hybrid Model for Morpho-syntactic Annotation of German with a Large Tagset. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2004). Barcelona, Spain.
     

  • S. Kübler (2004). Parsing Without Grammar--Using Complete Trees Instead. N. Nicolov & R. Mitkov & G. Angelova & K. Boncheva: Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing III: Selected Papers from RANLP 2003. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.